Evaluating someone’s hatred & supposed level of being “disgruntled” is usually a tactic to try to use an ad hominem against that person that hates – an attempt at trying to get the dissident to try to appear or say something that will be interpreted as alarming; “see, that person is not calm. That person is hysterical.” When actually it is the interpreter who is closer to being hysterical because that person could not receive the realist information with the same level of divorcement & willingness to probe the truth without twitching. Virgins are usually in a state of being free from the cultural conditioning that states that you have to have some sort of insignia for society to accept your mentality. Being concerned with someone’s hatred is influenced by the ignorant masses. Even if that hateful person is disgruntled, so what? Does a paper on reality lose credit because some coffee was spilled on it?
” Are you bitter?” This is obviously intended to not gauge a person’s degree of enlightenment, but to try to instill that that person is in some way emotionally or mentally “sick.”
If I’m going to be literal, of course I hate them for their actions, which I have experienced. Leaving subjectivity aside, one can check the statistics & my experiences are universal, both for those who are in cognitive dissonance & those who have accepted. I would only fear admitting that I hate females if it would potentially jeopardize what I needed, such as a job interview, or some “honorable” position of having some trendy faggots accept me.
A person at a higher plane of thought knows. As the saying goes, a wise man learns from the mistakes of others. If a trait is universal to females (& not to males to the same extent), then it would make sense to hate (or perhaps more accurately: vehemently despise) women for the actual fact of their being female, with all the skulduggery the feminine entails, without waiting around for proof of what is already self-evident and recorded by wise men from history. This is actually the more truthful and more righteous approach. It is in a woman’s nature to be despicable, thus she is to be disdained for her very existence.
Even amongst those supposedly not caring to be accepted by the trendy, the question of hate is used as a pretense of “trying to understand”. This instance is really just a sneaky, arbitrary test of “character”; “are you “civilized” enough to not be shamed?” Thus, that question is very literally a female borne social device to test how one is deemed as “proper”. It means basically nothing.
One thing I’ve noticed is that Female M.R.A.s & Trad-cons often use the history & science (quite poor science actually compared to more prominent M.G.T.O.W. & phallocentrists/androcentrists.) as a way to pardon the nature of females. What is funny is similar arguments could be used to help convicted felons of other crimes. Female M.R.A.s love to try to twist meaning by saying “hatred is obsession”; “you only think you hate women but you are actually so concerned with the problems due to loving them.” No, I really do hate females.
Women Against Feminist types especially of the trad-con persuasion, are almost similar to women extolling the virtues of the housewives only due to a combination of jealousy & resentment of easier females. Those house-wive types are mostly lying trad-con parasites who are just mad that their selling price has to go down due to competition in the sexual marketplace. They’re some fat, nagging whores who would usually not give their loyal husbands what they would a wandering Don-Juan loser who hypothetically happened to climb in through their window.
Females’ brains are different from the patrilineal. They lack capacity for abstract thought; they are unable to comprehend absolute justice, forbearance, morality, truth, logic, honor, etc., hence their better ability to intuit what is naturally their own trade when a male tries manipulative tactics on women & how they identify with Don-Juan types that use such tactics even more artfully. The theological stories of female sin causing female-hood enmass painful birth & degrading menstruation is an allegory, but, more bluntly, basically, most females are like males with damaged prefrontal lobes – mentally between being a pre-adolescent boy & a sociopath, or an alcoholic of many years.
Women can beguile and subvert only the men who love them, never those who hate/know.
Hatred is a disposition of being conclusive, regardless of how that hatred is shown – with a calm temperament, with a clown suit, with anger, doesn’t matter.