THIS ARTICLE IS NOTHING REALLY EXCEPTIONAL. I JUST FOUND IT MORE RECREATIONAL & AS MORE OF AN ANNOUNCEMENT FOR OTHERS TO BRING MORE ON PAUL JULIUS MOBIUS SINCE INFO. ON HIS WORK IS LACKING.
I REALIZE THAT HIS MATERIAL IS VERY OLD, & SOME WILL SAY “OH, THAT’S JUST OUTDATED NONSENSE”, HOWEVER, WE ARE LIVING NOW IN TIMES WHERE THERE IS AN INFO WAR HAPPENING. ANYONE WHO DOESN’T BELIEVE THIS IS EITHER NOT VERY INTELLIGENT OR IS TOO BUSY TO BE AWARE. WE HAVE NOW AN EXCESS OF POPULAR ENTERTAINMENT & OTHER FORMS OF DISTRACTION TO OBFUSCATE TRUTH. IN TIMES OF MOBIUS – BEFORE THERE WAS MUCH OF THIS BOMBARDMENT – PEOPLE COULD BE PERCEPTIVE TO BLATANTLY OBVIOUS REALITIES OF PEOPLE & SEXES. IT MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN POLITE TO SPEAK OF IT IN SOCIAL CIRCLES, BUT PEOPLE AT LEAST UNDERSTOOD THESE RUDIMENTARY ASPECTS TO BE A REALITY.
UNFORTUNATELY, IT IS DIFFICULT TO TRACK DOWN SOME OF THIS SCIENTIST’S MATERIAL, ESPECIALLY IN ENGLISH.
I ATTEMPTED TO TRANSLATE WORD-FOR-WORD VIA AN ONLINE TRANSLATOR HIS BOOK: ‘UBER DEN PHYSIOLOGISCHEN SCWACHSINN DES WEIBES’, WHICH ROUGHLY TRANSLATES TO: ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL IMBECILITY OF THE WOMAN, BUT WHEN I DID THIS, BECAUSE ONLINE TRANSLATORS AREN’T VERY RELIABLE, WHAT RESULTED WAS AN INCOHERENT MESS OF SORT OF BACKWARDS & REVERSED SYNTAX, & SOME OF THE GERMAN WORDS COULDN’T EVEN BE TRANSLATED AT ALL. SO, I WILL HAVE TO LEARN GERMAN COMPLETELY FLUENTLY TO READ THIS BOOK. BUT, THERE WAS ONE EXCERPT FROM THIS BOOK THAT I COULD DECIPHER JUST TO A VERY GENERAL LEVEL THAT IS RENDERED TO A PARAPHRASE OF:
The female weapon is usually resorted to the sheep level of the tongue & crying;
Cheap Insults, slander , anonymous Letters. The tongue is the sword of woman over,
Because their body weakness prevents them from physically striking. their weaknesses leaves women with the reality of turning the sport of civilized argumentation to a paradise of childish amusement for the woman.It can be thought to the chase of animals. The cat chases mice down & exhausts himself of energy.The woman has a calculating way with verbally selecting speech, & lieing is the naturally suited weapon of women.
What comes to mind upon reading the above transcription is the commonality of females attempting to detract one’s argument by harbingering unrelated or only slightly related concepts into the debate, or often resorting to striking in that of which is the most vulnerable when she feels insulted – rather than corroberating with rationality, attacking emotions instead. As Arthur Schopenhauer put it, “THE FEMALE HAS NO SENSE OF JUSTICE”. When a male feels insulted, he at least has the decency of perhaps, at worst, physically beat you, which then you can recover from within 2 weeks to 2 months. Females, on the other hand, will find vulnerable insecurities to strike, which can taint one for many years.
‘SLUTWALK’ IS ONE OF THESE SITUATIONS OF FEMINISTS’ INJECTION OF DISTRACTION. IT’S NOT ONLY A SUBCONSCIOUS GROUP EXPRESSION OF STATING WHO HAS THE POWER, IT’S ALSO A WAY FOR FEMINISTS TO CREATE MORE DISTRACTIONS BY HARBINGERING UNRELATED & NON IMPORTANT CONCEPTS, & IT’S ALSO AN ATTEMPT TO INDUCE EMOTIONALISM INTO REAL ARGUMENTS BY THE APPOSITION, IN ADDITION TO RUINING TRAFFIC OUT OF MEGALOMANIA.
In other news: Recent information I have stumbled upon from an audio interview stated that psychopathy could actually be the next stage in “evolution” due to feminine selection; because females often select for arrogant males that tend to act on impulse, which is akin to traits of psychopathy.