Science: Males Are Naturally More Romantic/”Sensitive” | by Jessie Nagy

men are more romantic

Most of man’s process is governed by a single drive: oxytocin. The emotional, psychological health of man depends upon whether he can receive this or whether access to it is blocked – excessive competition.

The body & psyche are obviously interconnected, & emotions influence how you function with work, etc..

With females influencing social interaction, a process of “armoring” of the male occurs of which he appears to be “dominant.” There is a terror that strikes the armored man when he is faced with expressions of different life of others, & this is responsible for the systematic armoring of newborn generations, & it has become organized in many of social institutions, which has resulted in the male tendency, born from fear, for protecting feminine tendencies at almost any price & to hide unpleasant truths, especially due to overpowering by the feminine.
A child who grows relatively free from armor will understand that the society is largely problematic, not he.

Doctors are also human: They also have to create their own fiction.

Of a fighting tournament of which only three winners will be awarded, obviously, there will be “first place”, “second place”, “third place.” That’s a homologue of how females see masculinity, then society uses that same model of mistaking a small portion as the standard. What’s more: society then strives for this unrealistic standard that females want, which causes confusion, etc..

What is MGM? No, I’m not referring to the film production. (Although that also has to stop, which is a different set of chapters.) M.G.M is male genital mutilation.

According to Billy Ray Boyd, author of ‘Circumcision Exposed – Rethinking A Medical & Cultural Tradition,’ a circumcisionist is one who advocates the routine of M.G.M.. a preservationist/sexual preservationist is one opposed to the routine cutting.
Mutilation or even sexual mutilation is much more accurate than the clinical term: circumcision.

We males are originally supposed to teach females romance & sensuality, & a LOT OF it. That’s the true “natural order.” Now females not only own sexuality for the most part, they also misapply sexuality without even knowing what their doing.
Untainted men, & I’m not saying this by a demeaning way, are so sensual that they can have orgasms by just stretching the foreskin back periodically without the typical stroking.

The figure of boys who have experienced M.g.m. is lower than the figure of the 1960s, which was 90%. In the future, M.G.M. will probably be thought as different from the norm, yet, unfortunately, female sexuality, with all its savagery, when men have taken another phase of evolution, will likely yearn for the olden days of “discipline” & clumsy sex, when men were “real men.”

The AAP – American Academy of Pediatrics – claimed that there no valid indications for m.g.m. in the neonatal period, then kept altering it’s idea on M.G.M. during 1989, claiming “The procedure has potential medical benefits & advantages, as well as inherent disadvantages & risks.” Consider “potential” of that context. it translates to not necessary. When the idea was changed slightly, the media did not emphasize serious reports on disadvantages & risks.
If women would be given the chance to report on something as serious as it, unlike the food criticism & hand-bag articles, etc., you’d typically find in a magazine by & for women, you’d get them adhering to the ~5% sociopath apex of men to make a collective statement, dismissing maltreatment of males by M.G.M., bragging about some lame degrees they got, even possibly humoring it.

It’s completely irresponsible to not endorse that parents help boys clean their penises, when many risks of complications, ranging from infection to baby’s different immunity, loss of shaft-skin, convulsions, massive damage to even internal organs, quadriplegia, impotence (no wonder there’s an industry for erectile dysfunction), & even death. Some infant’s entire penises have been entirely lost.

I tried having a conversation once with this “mature” whore taking psychology courses, telling her of the aggravating nature of M.G.M., & the fact that myself being intact, I don’t have that aggressive/numb personality. Her response, which is typical of female herds: “Talking about dicks doesn’t turn me on” – the total narcissistic personality disorder that mandates sociopathy, which only proves the female collectivism, regardless of their acclaimed superior “expertise”, will generally be an idiot. Their idiocy is actually transmitted into the organizations.

When the skin is torn on a molded plastic board called a “circumstraint” with velcro straps, the baby starts to scream, if he doesn’t experience shock. The comatose state is mistaken for a fine sleep. Some babies defecate or vomit (possibly contributing to infection).
Don’t think it’s “just a snip.” The process is actually ~1 week. The first ~5 minutes is the cutting process, after which there are days of abrasion, burning sensation due to urination, which happens more frequently with babies, & a swollen process.

In order to bring attention of the aggravating effects done to the subconscious minds of babies, you’d have to do studies on large groups for over periods of years. This type of study would obviously be absurd. Seriously, just think about it, but, of course, there’s always groups of women ready to claim “How come professors aren’t confirming that m.g.m. is bad or (if they even make further effort, which they wouldn’t) that it produces sadists/careless men, etc.?” But, actually, the author of ‘Circumcision Exposed’ does actually teach at City College of San Francisco. There’s also the DOC – Doctors Opposed to Circumcision. Most women don’t seriously care if something is right or wrong. They just care if it’s popularized. Think about it. Most women mostly care about mainly power.

The foreskin & its proximal zones fosters intimacy between the two partners. It is a smooth type of sexuality – non-clumsy. Don’t you understand? Men are naturally romantic & “sensitive” – the better sex.

Think about it: the skin meant to protect eyes is the same mechanism to protect the glans from rough/thorny underbrush, & the idea of m.g.m. diminishing infection is overdone.

When patients had the ravages of overwork & various abuses of the industrial revolution, attributed to ~5% of the apex that women are trying to get, doctor’s took patient’s medical history, found that they masturbated, then theorized that was the main cause of their pathologies. Never did they theorize that it was stress due to the survival instincts.

A number of doctors believe what they’re doing is “right” – survival collectivism/no time to think. Others admit they’re doing it for the money. Greed comes from survival instincts. Survival instincts stops serious thinking. Survival instincts comes from female collectivism. Remember: Most women’s main concern is power – arbitrary power.
There are financial plans for marketing baby foreskins. It’s a multi-million-dollar-a-year industry.
That’s why the Buddhist purists stated that female sexuality is disgusting: not because they were “timid” or were specifically thinking of something like this article, but because they knew of that relentless force that women like. That power is driven for the feminine.
Some Feminists might claim to want a more patient male, which is doubtfully questionable.
The provider to a whore is usually just a means to flee to a goal. The goal to her is that ~5% of arbitrary masculinity.

“It has been known for decades that circumcision provides no demonstrably medically necessary purpose. It is rooted in our culture, however.” – Blue Cross Blue Shield of Utah

The idea that intact men are more likely to spread AIDS is false. In regions that practice sexual mutilation less, though still a problem, is less epidemic.
The AIDS & pro-m.g.m. scare tactic started in 1996 with circumcisionist Aaron J. Fink. The m.g.m. industry has been trying to find evidence for this since that.
While there are studies suggesting that to not cut would increase contamination, there’s more prominent studies claiming that cut men are actually more likely to to contract & infect.
One suggestion is that a non-cut penis can gently slip in & out. A cut man will cause more friction & micro tears because of abnormal hardening.
Mass m.g.m. has also been suggested to have increased AIDS in the U.S. because of less condom use due to less sensitivity.
Teaching a boy good hygiene & safe sex will serve him much better. It also gives him an obligation to responsibility.

In fact, sexual mutilation is also arguably one useful means to desensitize a boy & socialize him into a culture in which war & other forms of violence are philosophized to be good/necessary.
Whenever you are inundated with news of how a courageous kid had to defend himself against a bully, it’s really just an excuse to watch a fight. What would his status be if he called security, etc.? He would be interpreted as a “pussy,” including by females.
As males, we’re coerced to deny our realistic selves.
We are welcomed into life by having a chunk of our penises cut off. Just let that actually register. If we’re subjected to extreme pain that we have no control over, we learn that life is a struggle, We are then disempowered or coerced to show “strength,” especially to females, & that’s the only reason that babies “get over it:” because their hijacked masculinity is considered the norm with denied information about the REAL effects of sexual mutilation.

Stating this to a female will have them laugh at you or label you “crazy” because female preference for dominant/anti-intellectual men is of use to them.

The basics: The dictionary states:

Anti-intellectual – a person who believes that intellect & reason are less important than actions & emotions in solving problems & understanding reality.

Female sexuality is to be shamed.
The female immature attraction to stupid/reactionary males makes it that the other males are coerced to have that female attraction as an aspirational example to compare themselves to.

In France & England, f.g.m. – female genital mutilation – is illegal. This is hailed, which is good that it’s illegal, yet if males wanted to brag about making it illegal for themselves, it would be ridiculed.
Male pain & loss is trivialized. In fact, especially to females, male loss will cause women to devalue a male even more – multiplied negatives.

The fact that sexual mutilation weakens the faculty of sexual excitement & diminishes the pleasure is indubitable. For if at birth this member has been made to bleed & has had it’s covering removed, it must indubitably be weakened. This is why males seek other wrong forms of satisfaction – “SADOSFACTON,” which becomes the cultural norm.

The foreskin is necessary for comfortable erections.. Even today, many doctors remove so much skin that, when the the penis reaches full size after puberty, erections can be uncomfortable.

The purpose of the prepuce, which maintains much stronger sex drive, is to protect the head of the organ, & to enhance communication with the partner: Men are more sensitive.

The presence of the prepuce anticipates those sexual prompting of young boys before puberty: That anticipation is rarer among cut boys. It is not “moral” to cut that out. The better strategy is education, specifically information, especially how to communicate with future partners sensuality. Cleaning, etc., is to be taught to rely on self will-power, which also teaches them to be reliant on themselves.

What the original foreskin of babies, which protects the glans from various dirt, etc., secretes is mild & even beneficial. It’s only the less common occurrence of excessive secretions that is bad, which can be trained to stop by basic, mature instruction of bathroom customs.

A man, William E. Kruger, aged 30 was persuaded by a doctor to be clipped. This anecdote is specifically scientific because he is capable of making the comparison since it happened to him years after the first days of life. Men who were cut when babies don’t know what their missing. On a letter to newspapers & intact organizations, he printed:

….”Sexual pleasure has been reduced by at least 70%, both in intensity & the fact that the whole rage of sensation is completely gone…. Two of the structures [foreskin & frenulum] were removed, & the only remaining structure, the head, has been toughened & desensitized… It is constantly exposed to the friction of clothing.. It has deprived me, caused physical pain & has been psychologically devastating. I no longer feel like a real man.”

The residual exposed gland mucosa becomes abnormally keratinized. During m.g.m. the frenular artery may also be cut, depriving the anterior urethra of its major blood supply.

Some would say: “But I’ve seen uncut men acting violent in porn.” Just like the deception of the fashion & minute slaps of uncut men with BDSM, that performer is owned by the producer(s). The producer(s) experienced m.g.m. (or were influenced by it). The producers are owned by the ~5% of arbitrary masculinity. Dominance hierarchy is only due to survival instincts. That equation is due to the feminine since women incentivize men to be excessively prepared with survival instincts, & the survival instincts is especially worse in harsher climates .

Females generally need more time to have better pleasure during passion. The uncut male has the capability of spanning/bonding & stopping the female to greedily make alterations. Retrospectively, Kristen O’Hara regarded the mutilated penis as a sort of unreal device that made intercourse not very pleasing, she wrote in a book.
I believe that this lessened pleasure of sexuality to be the TRUE main cause of normative culture having attitude of sexual harassment. When you put a taint on the dynamics of what is supposed to be a bonding/pleasant experience, the value of male sexuality will naturally be ruined. So not only do cut males not realize what their missing, but also females don’t know what they’re missing, just like how females don’t really know what passion is like with the archetypal “nice guy” that females dismiss as “shy” because they haven’t seriously tried him.

Being known for anti-m.g.m. research, I was sent a letter to my e-mail. It was a claim of a major mistake made by a 24-year-old Russian immigrant to U.S. who agreed to m.g.m. after his mid-20s. He stated that the former Soviet Union (Ukraine) did not practice m.g.m. (& it was discouraged.) He claimed that prior to m.g.m. his orgasms were  like “AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!” They were continuous, prolonged, followed by “all body” sensation that tickled & sent “waves” all over. Further:

“My grandfather once told me a story about how they used to train them to ride horses without a saddle, which hurt a lot & after a while, a layer grew on buttocks that made such riding painless. That’s what eventually happens to cut penises.”

We know what divorce truly is: women using the daddy-state on men when the husband does not please her anymore, etc., like using a rabid dog on something she doesn’t like. But it gets even more bestial than that:
The daddy-state – ~5% of arbitrary masculinity – that women love creates predatory cultures because of the greed due to attracting drives. It’s not fully conscious:
Males have what the cosmetic companies want. The similar type of skin meant to protect your eyelids is the same type of skin that naturally makes the gland excellent. Because of that, the cosmetic industry wants the source of fibroblasts – foreskins – to make various creams.
Meanwhile, whores will even claim that civilization is exploitative of the female body.

One surgeon, Lewis Sayre, (1870s) theorized that m.g.m. treated muscle paralysis. This was when reflex neurosis was taken seriously.M.g.m. was then used by other doctors for asthma, epilepsy, indigestion & hernia.Sayre’s reasoning was just relatively not that old considering the relatively minuscule amount of development with treating boy genitalia. Considering that, why should you take anything doctors say seriously about “fixing” boys?

In the U.S., doctors were content to continue to collect payments for doing m.g.m..

We think of scientists as very objective, & they usually are much more than others, but they’re also people, so they’re not totally objective.

As nutrition, shelter, etc. – the basics – become easily accessed, as it has, the further evolution is largely a moral one, so what makes us need MGM?

CPS – Canadian Paediatric Society – reconfirmed in 1996 what it claimed in 1975 – a new evidence based policy statement that m.g.m. should not be done.

The foreskin is fused to the head of the penis at birth. Its function is to stop contamination. Before the doctor can remove the skin, he has to separate the skin with insertion of a probe between the glans, then do a scraping around.

The rate of m.g.m. for good/wealthy-income owning males in U.S. was & is still high – 90%-67.7% [1995-2008]. For those with only & less than a high-school diploma it was 37.7% – 51.9%.
In order for civilization to be saved, it needs to, A., eliminate chivalry, &, B., eliminate m.g.m.

Even Joseph Ledoux, a professional neuroscientist, believes that fear & anxiety, Which has aggression as just another aspect of fear because it’s just simply a another choice of how to deal with fear – a desire for extra survival instincts, are not innate. They are cognitively assembled.

The new-age or spiritual idea that women have “more wisdom” comes from the fact that women only see the ~5% of arbitrary masculinity, whether it’s radical Feminists complaining about rape-culture – a small portion – or other women fantasizing about the apex of masculinity & also that women haven’t really done anything of merit to the comparison as males have, so their idelness is seen as having less turmoil than the standard, fixated model of ~5% arbitrary masculinity, which is really not what most of masculinity is.

A medieval piece of advice stated:

“She will court the man who is uncircumcised in the flesh & lie against his breast with great passion…”

Infection during prolonged periods of battle has crippled armies. Why would you be in that situation firstly? The answer is survival mechanisms. If they were less concerned with survival mechanisms & more concerned with harnessing conditions & surroundings with different ways, they could’ve eliminated much more of the problems anyway. Don’t you understand? It’s not cutting that’s the solution. It’s the lack of intellectual discipline to control, firstly, the self, secondly, surroundings that’s the problem.

M.G.M. has also become a fashion in Japan. It’s promoted in “girlie” magazines, etc..

The next part is extremely surprising. It was done by credible people involved in 1.: the Department of Molecular Cell Biology & Immunology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2.: Department of Dermatology & Venereology, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland. 3.: Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Even the WashingtonPost did something with it: ‘Scientists Discover Natural Barrier’ to HIV’
Nature Publishing Group did a study: ‘Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells’ Conclusion: Strategies to combat infection must not interfere with langerin function.
One of the main reasons that industry by the ~5% arbitrary masculinity is motivated to collect foreskins is that the skin contains substances promoting health-cells. It’s a skin that is “alive.” Langerin is lost by m.g.m.. Langerin actually kills HIV. Industry then uses the skin for various cosmetic purposes – injections, etc. – that is spent with millions.
We humans are supposed to allow the organic mechanisms to evolve the immunity.

The boy then develops a defensive, armored psychological state after m.g.m..

MGM is a direct example of hierarchical control. A modern example is US forces. Boot-camp is forcing & taunting. Subsumed by dominance hierarchy, the male is subject to enforce excessive survival instincts to give to her.

Economic & social change has influenced men to struggle, exemplified as “herbivores,” in Japan. Japan struggles with mental health. It’s not quantifiable when they don’t even recognize it as a problem. They have long work hours – 80-hour weeks. As gynocentric survival instincts takes its toll, males are persuaded to try MGM with the pretense that it “enhances self-confidence” by a common discursive strategy of clinics using the deployment of “scientific” facts as compelling reasons. The male body is seen as a commodity. You’ll often find these persuasions in male oriented books, such as older boys’ comics. There is a growing tolerance of divorce among contemporary Japanese women, there is info. that their men have “failed” to satisfy women’s demands, as usual. Can you beleive it? That culture that has the Geisha, a good sex education that emphasizes the female body as menarche & pregnancy process & where men are supposed to “come first” still has problems by whores. It just proves that being an “alpha” male is redundant. It was notable of the 1970s & 1980s, women refused marriage because they coudn’t find the three H’s – height, high education, high income. Most of Japanese culture is efficient. It has a reputation as a developed country. These whores were just deluded because the more you give to them, the more entitled whores become. With womens’ delusions putting stress to males to be an unreal ideal, women “push” more & more negative definitions of what maleness is. It’s the same repeating pattern: survival mechanisms for the feminine has exhausted, devastated masculinity. Japanese men are doing temporary or easier jobs. As a result of what women have done to them, females have seen them as “unmanly” for taking a “vacation.” Women have created “beta” males. The salary-man produced by survival instincts due to the feminine has created the “invisible” man as “nobody.” The place that’s known for overwork by being driven by survival mechanisms – providing life for whores – is also known for suicide. When gynocentrism flourishes, men are ruined. Women manufactured undesirable/”weak” men by way of the survival mechanisms they habituate that links reaction with maleness that trivializes & silences male experience. The prevalent survival mechanisms due to the feminine that males adopt to give to females creates marginalized males.

There are two types of phimosis: Physiological (congenital) phimosis & pathological phimosis. Physiological phimosis is usually benign & supposed to be left alone for early childhood. Pathological phimosis is a rare situation that happens when older. (Doctors should study stretching methods rather than cutting.)

Wherever FGM happens, MGM also does.
All types of FGM are generally seen as a violation, yet MGM is dismissed as “benign.”

Removing the clitoris, which occurs with FGM, is done to ensure that females do not derive pleasure, encouraging that they remain “pure.” The male equivalent to that would be to remove the head of the penis (possibly more). FGM is much worse, but happens much less.

Our society has a very hypocritical attitude towards sexual men, especially women have this attitude: If you’re a school-teacher who was seen trying to flirt with some females at a bar he’ll be seen as a “perv,” yet if you’re “James Bond” – doing all these unnecessary, mindless things – he’ll be glorified: women are allowed to express sex-positivity, but when a male does it, he has to be some animate/ toxic/ mumbling/ intruding figure to earn it.

In 1997, Canadian doctors did a study for the purpose of knowing what type of anesthesia was best for relieving pain of m.g.m.. They needed a control group to compare babies without anesthesia. The doctors realized that babies without anesthesia had so much pain, one of which even had a seizure & some began choking, that the study was too unethical to continue. If that severe level of pain happens without anesthesia, the pain is extreme even with it.
Only a minority of doctors use anesthesia.

Reality check: The body is a historical repository. The pain causes a rewiring of the brain. It causes problems with intimacy, low self-esteem, anger & PTSD. It is a myth that the baby “won’t” remember the pain. He won’t remember it the way we remember what our faces looked like this morning in front of the mirror, but he’ll remember it of the way of being in a mental mode of being “armored.” Acts of aggression, excessive selfishness can be traced by the moral architecture done early in life & goes to the neurobiological & emotional development.

Even a publisher not associated with the fringe: Psychology Today published an article stating that it is a myth that a baby will “sleep through it.” What actually happens is the baby often experiences a state of shock, which looks like a quiet state.

There is ample clinical evidence of the negative consequences of separating the new-born from the warmth of the mother – one of her main functions.

Defending m.g.m. requires dismissing/minimizing the harm & producing extremely exaggerated clinical claims about protection from future harm. Cultural conformity is a major force perpetuating m.g.m..

The divorce law means basically nothing, but that society usually allows it, especially women. The legal aspects are almost just as much a distraction from female nature as Feminism is. People tend to forget & not realize that both Feminism & female nature promote the same exact thing – the female ego unchecked.
With that unchecked female ego, females weed to try to get the ~5% arbitrary masculinity. Yes, women are evil. The female ego is a very destructive force to society.

Those who blame things like pornography for ruining society are the same ones who haven’t even realized that surgical rape is the true cause of their lack of utilizing control for establishment.

Obviously, there are others that are defensive about having experienced m.g.m.. They become pro-cutting as a way of coping. This seems to be an internalized anger.

The message given to new-born boys traumatized by surgical rape is that: you have just arrived in a very hostile, malevolent place. This is also the majority of how we get “don’t be a beta male” nonsense.” Additionally conveyed:  your sex center is not respected, which also accounts for males doing other things as a replacement for bonding, ranging from bad experimentation to other forms of buying.
First paralyzed during birth, then humiliated for trying to draw attention to the reality of m.g.m..

I’ve even heard a woman state that she would think that a man was “gay” if she saw him crying in a public setting. If one woman said that, it’s obvious what the spectrum of female collectivism would interpret.

Reality check: Amputation of the erogenous zone consequently transforms the mind to a “lifeless zombie.”: neuropsychological intervention or non-genetic bioengineering.

The dictionary states:

noun, Psychiatry.

1. difficulty in experiencing, expressing, & describing emotional responses.

But if we analyze this definition correctly, it would translate to:

1. A psychological state acquired by males which the human female is usually receptive to.

2. An acquired psychological state of males which the human female has monopolized majority of attention with the aid of a small portion of an aggregate of males that has given her a gladdened state with the expense of the other males.

Dr. Whitfield has presented that depression (or lack there of – apathy/dispassion) & emotional trauma that affects future behavior is by disruption of neurodevelopment – a form of mind damage.

Women buy that state of masculinity more than anyone. Do you know why that is? It’s because women are naturally prone to various forms of sociopathic tendencies.

Dr. James Demeo believes that it is “only” the influence of desert regions that has caused the majority of the most severe cultures of surgical rape, sex-misapplication, social abuse & warfare. That definitely added to it. The main, specific, core cause is actually survival mechanisms of the feminine. Those survival mechanisms with extreme, harsh climates brings out the worst of masculinity.

MGM as child abuse has gotten nearly no attention on child-abuse. In fact, the society considers adolescent romance as a mischievous thing & encourages trading with vapid “hook up” culture.

A major cause for social abuse/negative ego is the tendency of replacing romance/sensitivity with exertion & trial. Society is constructed as social stress acceptance. Violence, drug abuse, conforming to lame situations is the result.
The behavioral effects of marijuana – a popular emasculating drug – is: low self-esteem, loss of identity, loss of motivation, etc., & it is actually encouraged by Hollywood, etc..
Overseas, the more violence-prone is characterized by political bullying, religious bullying, etc..

Feminist persuasion & related factions politicize agendas with the consequences of stopping the cooperative “search for truth” because of the very fact that females evolved to be more selfish. Women are generally anti-science, which is not much different from the bullying formerly typed.

The greatest threat to civilization comes from depriving the young of affection.
Violence is often offered as a “solution” to violence.
The common association of sex with violence implies deprivation of affection.

People are searching for other forms of satisfaction, yet most of them are substitutes for not knowing how sexuality or affection works.

Until the ruin of affection, etc., is understood – survival mechanisms, gynocentric aggression will continue to escalate.

A developmental neuropsychologist, James W. Prescott, has convinced that violence & affection have effects on each other: one inhibits the other.

Certain sensory experience during the formative years of development will create neuropsychological predisposition for either struggle-seeking – the norm – or sensual-seeking.

Brande F. Steele, psychiatrist at the University of Colorado, noted that almost all women who abuse had never experienced orgasm (not that giving them pleasure will make them better people necessarily: I’m condoning male terms.) The female is generally more promiscuous anyway, which is a type of abuse to the male’s tendency to stabilize a relationship & stop the search. Women are much more opportunistic/selfish. Without the true androcentric/phallocentric control, women are problematic. When frequent self-needs are combined with deprivation of affection, the result is self-interest & frequent rates of narcissistic personality disorder.

Crime, violence, etc., has increased. According to FBI statistics, Violence increased 53% between 1967 & 1972. Rape to 70%.

There is evidence of preference & acceptance for sexual violence instead of proper sexuality in the U.S.. Pop culture films, which I don’t care to name, depict sexually violent films, & yet films featuring proper sexual pleasure is less respected. The bondage, discipline, sadistic masochism is in many romance novels read by women, with the idea that pain “helps” build strong character & relationships – female pornography.
If violence is high, sensuality is low, & the converse is true.
The depraved sexuality/violence factor found in aggressive cultures is the same for modern industrialization.

The US is a competitive/aggressive/violent society. Consequently, it supports drugs, including corporate ones.

Signs of males not complying to the norms will be seen as “weakness” to females.

Reality check: the competitive drives of the survival mechanisms of female collectivism, which makes boys popular with the expense of other more intelligent males, should be replaced by phallocentric cooperation & a pursuit of the intellect for its own sake.
Without females & males properly compartmentalized, especially during early age of the time of schooling, we experience reversals & regression, etc.. For example: almost all advertising nowadays features the idea of having or getting sex appeal. So the present time features attitudes & changes that have been done before.
Modern philosophy & even science, such as the medical practice of m.g.m., etc., presents the idea that there is no absolute laws – whatever “turns you on,” & anyone who doesn’t think like that is seen as a “crazy loser.”

Feminism is theoretical, & they might claim to want to lead society, but If we lived in a society that’s even more matriarchal, females would then chose more negative male figures, which is the state.

Reality check: premature weaning of the male – cutting of the boy’s genitals, by the repressive social institutions of survival instincts, comes the careless, rigid, dull, nihilistic, components, which are expressed with a plethora of either disguised & unconscious, or blatantly obvious ways.

Since m.g.m. was spread as a product of the most extreme people who came from hyper-arid deserts, this is all the more reason for siding & regions above to monopolize phallocentric polygamy that would replace gynocentric survival mechanisms & would overpower the spread of psychopathic influences originally intensified by the collectivist gynocentric survival mechanisms with the desert.
Even Scottsdale, Az., an extremely unfriendly, rigid, lame, stupid, rude place, was ranked one of the rudest cities in US, with Phoenix as #2. But I have to remind there are other rude cities like New York, Miami & others, because U.S. is home to m.g.m..

Childhood trauma without physical abuse can cause various psychiatric disorders: anxiety & panic disorder being some. If non-physical abuse can do that, of course, surgical rape will do another effect.
Initially identified with, but not limited to, combat veterans, PTSD results by natural disaster, etc., etc., & yet the experience that would motivate one for combat is m.g.m..
We know that biology endows us with the structure of the brain. However, myriad connections are influenced by experience. We know that changes of hormone levels, early experiences influence brain development:
When extreme cortisol levels attack the hippocampus of the brain, it showed it’s alteration by lower verbal memory scores.
Even small alterations of environment had lasting changes in development, behavior & response to stress. Even five minutes of human handling during a rat’s infancy produced lifelong beneficial changes.
Isolation produces stress that has deleterious effect on neurology & behavior development.
Using the models of basic neglect & abuse, low rates of proper maternal attention decrease production of certain hormonal processes. This decreases serotonin in the hippocampus & affects development of receptors for stress hormone: glucocorticoid. Since corticosterone, one of our primary stress hormones, is kept in check by a technical feedback process that depends on these same stress hormone receptors, inadequate develpment increases risk of an excessive stress hormone response to adversity. Lack of proper maternal attention predisposes one to have heightened level of adrenaline response & fear.
Finally, wrong maternal attention is associated with a lifelong decrease in production of the hormone oxytocin in the brain. Oxytocin is a critical hormone of love & maintaining monogamus relationships. By affecting such hormones, early abuse could predispose one to diminished capacity for sexual perfection. Thanks to m.g.m., which causes either defeatist or dominant mentalities, it’s no wonder commitment is actually seen as a joke when oxytocin levels are ruined coupled with vasopressin mediated arousal. We now have females with men who basically exhibit borderline personality disorder & lame relationships.
With the female proclivity to greed, expansionism combined with the survival mechanisms of female collectivism & the female ego to announce herself as a career woman, meaningless blogger, etc., you will have an increase of such phenomena.
Children who have been abused even meet the diagnostic criteria for ADHD & impulsiveness. It’s no wonder there’s a meme that boys are failing school when m.g.m. predisposes boys to nihilism.
The brain is more malleable before puberty.
Another consequence of childhood maltreatment is limbic irritability, which tends to produce dysphoria, aggression & violence.
Being “too nice” is actually supposed to be the state. Effrontery, irritability, dissociation, being insipid, decreased judgment & decreased verbal ability – isn’t it all familiar? That is unfortunately the norm, so next time you are bombarded with some whore emphasizing “body positivity” for her slovenly life-style, realize there’s more important issues.

Scientist: Simon Baron-Cohen is missing this reality of m.g.m., as he states that men are prone to relating with people as just things. That’s true because we’re objectively prone to some kind of structures, which is more of a net gain for society, but he has no serious studies of m.g.m., which is a practice started by only a small percentage of masculinity, just like the model of male aggression is overdone. It’s true to a certain degree that women are empathic, i.e. lacking the ability to seriously evaluate good character, so they’re taken by immoral people/situations, etc., which is how they’re collectivist. Male empathy though is more about solving problems rather than commingling with bad situations & people, etc..
Simon Baron Cohen seems to be pandering to the feminine collective by not stating that the majority of male aggression is a vestige of the merciless past when we had to be extra violent for security, etc..

There is no direct tie between testosterone & human criminality. There is only an INDIRECT tie.

Delinquent behavior is more common among children raised with absent fathers.

When the level of oxytocin increases, generosity, etc, with strangers also happens. When oxytocin increases, other neurotransmitters are released: Serotonin decreases anxiety. Dopamine is associated with goal-directed bahaviors.

The problem is: women see male-female friendship as “activity friends” for a lack of a better description: The friendship is based on exchange of popularity, greed, etc., rather than compassion. Women think of male “healing” as “creepy.”

When wives are not sexed properly, she then becomes neurotic, rigid, & frustrated, making the kids vulnerable to a hostile mother: her delusions & greed makes unhealthy implications when not checked by the masculine energy.

It was reported that a culture with only a 2% population of men who experienced m.g.m. committed more than 80% of rapes.

Almost all wars involved a country that did m.g.m. since 1991. This includes US vs. Vietnam, which was obviously before 1991.

Dr. Tinari proceded a study which found that m.g.m. causes brain damage, particularly of areas of the brain involved with reasoning, emotions & perception.
His was not popularized, not because it’s “wrong,” but because it disrupts the status quo.



References: (I do not 100% condone all references derived.)

Circumcision Exposed – Rethinking A Medical & Cultural Tradition by Bill Ray Boyd, pg. 19-23, 52-53, 60-64, 71-73

Phimosis, Adult Circumcision, and Buried Penis | by Ryan P Terlecki, MD

antiintellectual – dictionary-dot-com

P.C. Remondino, History of circumcision from the earliest times to the present: Moral & physical reasons for its performance, p.224

The Barbarity of Circumcision as a Remedy for Congenital Abnormality, p. 16 by Herbert Snow

A Treatise On The Venereal Disease by John Hunter, p.221

Frances’ tough stance on female genital mutilation is working, say campaigners by Kim Wilsher – TheGuardian-dot-com

Female genital mutilation (FGM) – legislation, Policy & Guidance – nspcc-dot-org-dot-uk

Douglas Gairder, “The fate of the foreskin: A study of circumcision,” British Medical Journal, p. 1437

William E. Krueger, Winston-Salem NC, USA, open letter to newspapers & intact organizations, 12 July 1993

C.J. Cold & J.R. Taylor, “The prepuce”, British Journal of Urology, Vol. 83, supplement 1 (Circumcision), 1999, p. 41

Kristen O’Hara, Sex As Nature Intended, p. 20, 29-30, 66, 67

Infant Circumcision, Fibroblasts & The Cosmetics Industry by Barbarossa – Sheddingoftheego-dot-com

Why Is Circumcision So Popular in America by Mathew Tontonoz – mathewtontonozo-dot-com

History of Circumcision, Introduction, Recent History – cirp-dot-org

Time for U.S. Parents to Reconsider the Acceptability of Infant Male Circumcision by Morten Frisch – huffingtonpost-dot-com

Rate of Circumcision in Adults & Newborns – circinfo-dot-net

Anxious: The Modern Mind in the Age of Anxiety by Joseph E Ledoux, book review by Liz Hoggard – independent-dot-com

Medieval Advice for the Circumcised by Joshua Levine – levinehistory-dot-wordpress-dot-com

Circumcision – What Caused Many Cultures to Ritually Remive the Foreskin? – circinfo-dot-net

Involuntary Foreskinectomy Awareness | Buying Baby Foreskin by Phallusy – sites-dot-google-dot-com

Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells | by Lot de Witte, Alexey Nabatov, Marjorie Pion, Donna Fluitsma, Marein A W P de Jong, Tanja de Gruijl, Vincent Piguet, Yvette van Kooyk & Teunis B H Geijtenbeek – nature-dot-com-slash-naturemedicine

Scientists Discover ‘Natural Barrier’ to HIV by E.J. Mundell | HealthDay Reporter – washingtonpost-dot-com

Burton, John W., Culture and the Human Body: An Anthropological Perspective, pg.:

History of Circumcision – d-dot-umn-dot-edu

One of the world’ most developed & debt-ridden countries is undergoing a population crisis – here’s a possible reason why by Drake Baer – businessinsider-dot-com

The long and short of male circumcision in Japan | by Matt Treyvaud – japantimes-dot-co-jp

Phimosis & Paraphimosis – soc-dot-ucsb-dot-edu


Incidene & Distribution of Gental Cutting Worldwide – circumstitions-dot-com

FGC vs MGC – Circumsitions-dot-com

The ‘beauty’ of Male Circumcision in Japan: Gender, Sexuality & the Male Body in a medical practice by Genaro Castro-Vazquez p:4-6, 9 – researchgate-dot-net

Myths about Circumcision You LIkely Believe | by Darcia Narvaez, Ph.D. – PsychologyToday-dot-com

Reich Speaks of Freud | Wilhelm Reich. Kurt Eissler, p. 28

Psychological implications of circumcision – acroposthion-dot-com

alexithymia – dictionary-dot-com

It’s Not all in Your Head: Unearthing the Deep Roots of Depression | Tony Giordano, p. 130

Research Summary & Author Interview on Saharasia – orgonelad-dot-org

The Journal of Orgonomy, Vol33 | W.B. Apple, Ph.d., pg 77

Body Pleasure & The Origins Of Violence | by James W. Prescott – Bulltetin of the Atomic Scientists, p. 10, 11, 14

Wounds That Time Won’t Heal: The Neurobiology of Child Abuse | Martin H. Teicher – Cerebrum – The Dana Forum on Brain Science, p.: 4-6, 10-14

The Origins & Diffusion of Patrism in Saharasia, c. 4000 BCE: Evidence for a Worldwide, Climate-Linked Geographical Pattern in Human Behavior
by James Demeo, Ph.D. – orgonelab-dot-org

The 5 Hidden Reasons Men Become Violent & What We Can Do to Make the World Safer | by JedDiamond – menalive-dot-com

Survey: Phoenix, Scottsdale among rudest U.S. cities, according to Travel & leisure – abc15-dot-com

Phoenix ranked No. 2 Rudest City in U.S. – azfamily-dot-com

Excuse you! Phoenix ranked one of America’s rudest cities – ktar-dot-com

Phoenix ranked NO. 2 Rudest city in U.S. – 12news-dot-com

As Long As We Have Slaughterhouses, We’ll Have Wars | DR. Sahadeva Dasa p. 149

Circumcision Leads To Serial Killing & Criminal Behavior – birthofanewearth-dot-blogspot-dot-com

Extreme trauma from male circumcision causes damage to areas of the brain | Ethan A.Huff – naturalnews-dot-com


4 thoughts on “Science: Males Are Naturally More Romantic/”Sensitive” | by Jessie Nagy

    1. Thanks.

      As I was studying for that one, I stumbled on a another book called ‘The Munchausen Complex’ (Socialization of Violence & abuse) by DR. Richard Matteoli. I think it might give a more thorough investigation of the violence promotion of culture. (But it could also be a lame book blaming it on the “patriarchy”. More complicated than that.) Will try to hunt for a PDF version.

      I’m tired of being bombarded with “advice” from dating sites of “girls don’t like nice guys.” They’d rather be traitors then “call them out.”


    2. Hey, Hedon, your question on ‘Smart & Sexy’ got lost in my shuffle, so I didn’t answer it for a long time. Then my answer to it, I think, also got lost in your shuffle.

      My production will be slower now due to knew job schedule & more taxing research.


  1. No worries, bro. I was able to figure out some of the confusing theories in the book.

    I’ve been very busy as well which is why I haven’t update the website in a while. I’ll be busy through October, so things will slow on my end significantly, but you know how to reach me. Feel free to get at me anytime you need to.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s